Hd 8790m Vs Gtx 960m Benchmark

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs AMD Radeon Hard disk drive 8790M

Cost now 799$

Games supported 72%

Price at present 460$

Games supported 62%

General info

Comparison of graphics card compages, market segment, value for money and other full general parameters.

Place in functioning rating	352	597
Value for coin	1.83	0.26
Compages	Maxwell	GCN
GPU code name	N16P-GX	Mars XTX
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release appointment	12 March 2015 (seven years agone)	16 Nov 2012 (nine years ago)
Price now	$799	$460

Value for money

To go the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

General functioning parameters such every bit number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing procedure, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of functioning, but for precise assessment y'all have to consider their benchmark and gaming exam results. Note that ability consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	no data
CUDA cores	640	no information
Core clock speed	1096 MHz	no data
Heave clock speed	1202 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	950 meg
Manufacturing procedure engineering science	28 nm	28 nm
Thermal design ability (TDP)	75 Watt	unknown
Texture fill rate	47.04	21.60
Floating-point functioning	ane,505 gflops	691.2 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon HD 8790M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing 1. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connexion slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Limited three.0	no information
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	MXM-A (iii.0)
SLI options	+	no data

Retentiveness

Parameters of retentivity installed: its blazon, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and employ a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	no information
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	no data
Shared retention	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. Equally a rule, data in this section is precise but for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may modify the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) back up	+	no information
HDMI	+	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular engineering science for your purposes.

GameStream	+	no data
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	no data
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	no data
Optimus	+	no information
BatteryBoost	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	no data
Shader Model	5.1	v.ane
OpenGL	4.5	no information
OpenCL	1.ii	no data
Vulkan	1.i.126	no information
CUDA	+	no data

Benchmark operation

Not-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall criterion functioning is measured in points in 0-100 range.

---

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, merely if you notice some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we commonly fix problems speedily.

• 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
• 3DMark Fire Strike Score
• 3DMark Burn Strike Graphics
• 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
• Passmark

Deject Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level ten benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced past 3DMark Night Raid.

Fire Strike is a DirectX xi benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two dissever tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic plenty graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. Information technology used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken transport, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark eleven is now superseded by Fourth dimension Spy.

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, ten, 11 and 12 (the last beingness done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon HD 8790M. Unremarkably measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)

175 Mh/south

lxxx Mh/s

Gaming performance

Permit's come across how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the boilerplate frames per 2nd in a big gear up of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	95	no data
1080p	36 +28.half dozen%	28 −28.half-dozen%
1440p	15	no data
4K	thirteen	no data

1920x1080
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 +525%	iv−5 −525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +200%	4−five −200%
Battleground five	38 +850%	4−five −850%
Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−xiv +200%	iv−v −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Weep 5	28 +600%	four−5 −600%
Far Cry New Dawn	27 +575%	4−v −575%
Forza Horizon 4	35 +775%	iv−5 −775%
Hitman iii	12−14 +200%	4−v −200%
Horizon Null Dawn	12−14 +200%	iv−5 −200%
Red Dead Redemption two	12−14 +200%	4−five −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24 +500%	4−five −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +200%	iv−five −200%

1920x1080
High Preset

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey	19 +375%	four−5 −375%
Assassinator'southward Creed Valhalla	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Battleground five	31 +675%	4−5 −675%
Telephone call of Duty: Mod Warfare	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry five	25 +525%	4−5 −525%
Far Cry New Dawn	25 +525%	four−v −525%
Forza Horizon iv	31 +675%	4−5 −675%
Hitman 3	12−xiv +200%	4−five −200%
Horizon Aught Dawn	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Metro Exodus	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +200%	four−5 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19 +375%	4−5 −375%
The Witcher three: Wild Hunt	24 +500%	4−v −500%
Sentinel Dogs: Legion	12−14 +200%	4−v −200%

1920x1080
Ultra Preset

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey	11 +175%	iv−v −175%
Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Battlefield five	26 +550%	four−5 −550%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry 5	23 +475%	4−5 −475%
Far Cry New Dawn	23 +475%	4−v −475%
Forza Horizon 4	25 +525%	4−5 −525%
The Witcher iii: Wild Chase	14 +250%	4−5 −250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−xiv +200%	iv−five −200%

2560x1440
Loftier Preset

Call of Duty: Mod Warfare	12−xiv +200%	4−5 −200%
Hitman three	12−14 +200%	four−5 −200%
Horizon Naught Dawn	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Metro Exodus	12−fourteen +200%	4−5 −200%
Red Expressionless Redemption two	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	11 +175%	4−5 −175%
The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt	12−14	no information

2560x1440
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	eight +100%	4−five −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Battlefield 5	17 +325%	4−5 −325%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−fourteen +200%	four−five −200%
Far Cry 5	fifteen +275%	iv−5 −275%
Far Cry New Dawn	15 +275%	4−5 −275%
Forza Horizon 4	18 +350%	4−v −350%
Sentry Dogs: Legion	12−xiv +200%	4−5 −200%

3840x2160
Loftier Preset

Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +200%	iv−five −200%
Hitman 3	12−fourteen +200%	4−five −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +200%	four−v −200%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +200%	4−v −200%
Ruby-red Dead Redemption 2	12−fourteen +200%	four−5 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +200%	four−five −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 +150%	4−5 −150%

3840x2160
Ultra Preset

Assassin'south Creed Odyssey	12−14 +200%	iv−5 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Battlefield 5	3 −33.3%	4−5 +33.iii%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−five −200%
Far Cry 5	7 +75%	4−5 −75%
Far Cry New Dawn	half-dozen +50%	4−v −50%
Forza Horizon 4	12−xiv +200%	4−5 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +200%	iv−5 −200%

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance rating	eleven.69	4.45
Novelty	12 March 2015	16 November 2012

Judging past the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Urban center recommends

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

since it shows better operation.

---

Should y'all still take questions apropos pick betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you lot recollect we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---

Competitors of GeForce GTX 960M by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 960M from AMD is Radeon R9 M470X, which is slower by i% and lower past 1 position in our rating.

Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 960M:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 100

Competitors of Radeon Hard disk 8790M by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 8790M from NVIDIA is GeForce 930MX, which is well-nigh equal in speed and college by 1 position in our rating.

Hither are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Hd 8790M:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with operation more or less close to those reviewed, providing you lot with more than probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, every bit well as rate them yourself.

---

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M on a scale of 1 to five:

Charge per unit AMD Radeon Hd 8790M on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here y'all can ask a question about this comparison, concord or disagree with our judgements, or report an fault or mismatch.

---

Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

California Consumer Privacy Act ("CCPA")

Under CCPA, Californian residents have the right to declare their preferences on the sale of data for advertising and marketing purposes. If yous wish to change your preferences, click this link to launch our preference portal:

Californian residents also have the right to admission and/or delete nerveless data about them. If you wish to invoke either right, please see this link.

We use a 3rd-political party to provide monetisation technologies for our site. You can review their privacy and cookie policy hither.

Changes

We may update this privacy policy from time to fourth dimension in order to reflect, for example, changes to our practices or for other operational, legal or regulatory reasons.

Contact us

For more data about our privacy practices, if you have questions, or if you would similar to make a complaint, please contact us past e-mail at .

haketruits.blogspot.com

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-960M-vs-Radeon-HD-8790M

Share this post